Zimt AG wrote down the value of its inventory in 2007 and reversed the write | 您所在的位置:网站首页 › inventory write down cfa › Zimt AG wrote down the value of its inventory in 2007 and reversed the write |
NO.PZ2016012101000147 问题如下 Zimt wrote wn the value of its inventory in 2007 anreversethe write-wn in 2008. Compareto the results the company woulhave reporteif the write-wn hnever occurre Zimt’s reporte2008:(assume the companies use a perioc inventory system) A.profit woverstate B.cash flow from operations woverstate C.year-eninventory balanwoverstate is correct.The reversof the write-wn shiftecost of sales from 2008 to 2007. The 2007 cost of sales whigher because of the write-wn, anthe 2008 cost of sales wlower because of the reversof the write-wn. a result, the reporte2008 profits were overstate Inventory balanin 2008 is the same because the write-wn anreverscancel eaother out. Cash flow from operations is not affectethe non-cash write-wn, but the higher profits in 2008 likely resultein higher taxes anthus lower cash flow from operations.解析题目问相比假设2007年不发生存货跌价(那么2008年就没有回转了),真实情况中(发生了跌价和回转)的2008年财报数字会怎么样?相比没发生什么都没发生的情形,实际的2008年的COGS更低,因此NI更高,所以profit高估了,A正确。跌价和回转是否会影响到应税所得,取决于所得税法是否承认计提存货跌价准备,一般来说税务局不承认存货跌价准备,因此存货跌价和回转不影响应税所得,不影响现金流。但各国所得税法不尽相同,如果税务局承认存货跌价,则2008年利润高的情况下交税多,CFO就少,无论怎么判断都不是overstateB错误。真实情况是发生了存货跌价,但是又转回了,存货价值先降低,然后又增加,最后的存货价值与没发生跌价 回转的情况是相同的,所两种情况下,2008年存货的价值是相等的,不存在高估或低估的情况,C错误。 我理解NI是2018年的增量,INV是存量,COGS在2017年末先下降,所以影响了NI,而COGS在2018年上升,对INV没影响,是这个意思么 2023-02-26 22:20 2 · 回答NO.PZ2016012101000147问题如下Zimt wrote wn the value of its inventory in 2007 anreversethe write-wn in 2008. Compareto the results the company woulhave reporteif the write-wn hnever occurre Zimt’s reporte2008:(assume the companies use a perioc inventory system)A.profit woverstateB.cash flow from operations woverstateC.year-eninventory balanwoverstate is correct.The reversof the write-wn shiftecost of sales from 2008 to 2007. The 2007 cost of sales whigher because of the write-wn, anthe 2008 cost of sales wlower because of the reversof the write-wn. a result, the reporte2008 profits were overstate Inventory balanin 2008 is the same because the write-wn anreverscancel eaother out. Cash flow from operations is not affectethe non-cash write-wn, but the higher profits in 2008 likely resultein higher taxes anthus lower cash flow from operations.解析题目问相比假设2007年不发生存货跌价(那么2008年就没有回转了),真实情况中(发生了跌价和回转)的2008年财报数字会怎么样?相比没发生什么都没发生的情形,实际的2008年的COGS更低,因此NI更高,所以profit高估了,A正确。跌价和回转是否会影响到应税所得,取决于所得税法是否承认计提存货跌价准备,一般来说税务局不承认存货跌价准备,因此存货跌价和回转不影响应税所得,不影响现金流。但各国所得税法不尽相同,如果税务局承认存货跌价,则2008年利润高的情况下交税多,CFO就少,无论怎么判断都不是overstateB错误。真实情况是发生了存货跌价,但是又转回了,存货价值先降低,然后又增加,最后的存货价值与没发生跌价 回转的情况是相同的,所两种情况下,2008年存货的价值是相等的,不存在高估或低估的情况,C错误。 交税多不应该现金流流出的就多吗?为什么cfo会少,突然不理解了 2023-02-18 23:05 1 · 回答NO.PZ2016012101000147 问题如下 Zimt wrote wn the value of its inventory in 2007 anreversethe write-wn in 2008. Compareto the results the company woulhave reporteif the write-wn hnever occurre Zimt’s reporte2008:(assume the companies use a perioc inventory system) A.profit woverstate B.cash flow from operations woverstate C.year-eninventory balanwoverstate is correct.The reversof the write-wn shiftecost of sales from 2008 to 2007. The 2007 cost of sales whigher because of the write-wn, anthe 2008 cost of sales wlower because of the reversof the write-wn. a result, the reporte2008 profits were overstate Inventory balanin 2008 is the same because the write-wn anreverscancel eaother out. Cash flow from operations is not affectethe non-cash write-wn, but the higher profits in 2008 likely resultein higher taxes anthus lower cash flow from operations.解析题目问相比假设2007年不发生存货跌价(那么2008年就没有回转了),真实情况中(发生了跌价和回转)的2008年财报数字会怎么样?相比没发生什么都没发生的情形,实际的2008年的COGS更低,因此NI更高,所以profit高估了,A正确。跌价和回转是否会影响到应税所得,取决于所得税法是否承认计提存货跌价准备,一般来说税务局不承认存货跌价准备,因此存货跌价和回转不影响应税所得,不影响现金流。但各国所得税法不尽相同,如果税务局承认存货跌价,则2008年利润高的情况下交税多,CFO就少,无论怎么判断都不是overstateB错误。真实情况是发生了存货跌价,但是又转回了,存货价值先降低,然后又增加,最后的存货价值与没发生跌价 回转的情况是相同的,所两种情况下,2008年存货的价值是相等的,不存在高估或低估的情况,C错误。 先减值在回转与什么都没发生相比,COGS应该没有改变,为什么说COGS会减少,profit会增加? 2023-02-04 22:06 3 · 回答NO.PZ2016012101000147问题如下Zimt wrote wn the value of its inventory in 2007 anreversethe write-wn in 2008. Compareto the results the company woulhave reporteif the write-wn hnever occurre Zimt’s reporte2008:(assume the companies use a perioc inventory system)A.profit woverstateB.cash flow from operations woverstateC.year-eninventory balanwoverstate is correct.The reversof the write-wn shiftecost of sales from 2008 to 2007. The 2007 cost of sales whigher because of the write-wn, anthe 2008 cost of sales wlower because of the reversof the write-wn. a result, the reporte2008 profits were overstate Inventory balanin 2008 is the same because the write-wn anreverscancel eaother out. Cash flow from operations is not affectethe non-cash write-wn, but the higher profits in 2008 likely resultein higher taxes anthus lower cash flow from operations.解析题目问相比假设2007年不发生存货跌价(那么2008年就没有回转了),真实情况中(发生了跌价和回转)的2008年财报数字会怎么样?相比没发生什么都没发生的情形,实际的2008年的COGS更低,因此NI更高,所以profit高估了,A正确。跌价和回转是否会影响到应税所得,取决于所得税法是否承认计提存货跌价准备,一般来说税务局不承认存货跌价准备,因此存货跌价和回转不影响应税所得,不影响现金流。但各国所得税法不尽相同,如果税务局承认存货跌价,则2008年利润高的情况下交税多,CFO就少,无论怎么判断都不是overstateB错误。真实情况是发生了存货跌价,但是又转回了,存货价值先降低,然后又增加,最后的存货价值与没发生跌价 回转的情况是相同的,所两种情况下,2008年存货的价值是相等的,不存在高估或低估的情况,C错误。 姨爹谁在先在后很关键啊?老是分不清楚。 2023-01-25 09:02 1 · 回答 |
CopyRight 2018-2019 实验室设备网 版权所有 |