Zimt AG wrote down the value of its inventory in 2007 and reversed the write 您所在的位置:网站首页 inventory write down cfa Zimt AG wrote down the value of its inventory in 2007 and reversed the write

Zimt AG wrote down the value of its inventory in 2007 and reversed the write

2023-06-18 23:33| 来源: 网络整理| 查看: 265

NO.PZ2016012101000147 问题如下 Zimt wrote wn the value of its inventory in 2007 anreversethe write-wn in 2008. Compareto the results the company woulhave reporteif the write-wn hnever occurre Zimt’s reporte2008:(assume the companies use a perioc inventory system) A.profit woverstate B.cash flow from operations woverstate C.year-eninventory balanwoverstate is correct.The reversof the write-wn shiftecost of sales from 2008 to 2007. The 2007 cost of sales whigher because of the write-wn, anthe 2008 cost of sales wlower because of the reversof the write-wn. a result, the reporte2008 profits were overstate Inventory balanin 2008 is the same because the write-wn anreverscancel eaother out. Cash flow from operations is not affectethe non-cash write-wn, but the higher profits in 2008 likely resultein higher taxes anthus lower cash flow from operations.解析题目问相比假设2007年不发生存货跌价(那么2008年就没有回转了),真实情况中(发生了跌价和回转)的2008年财报数字会怎么样?相比没发生什么都没发生的情形,实际的2008年的COGS更低,因此NI更高,所以profit高估了,A正确。跌价和回转是否会影响到应税所得,取决于所得税法是否承认计提存货跌价准备,一般来说税务局不承认存货跌价准备,因此存货跌价和回转不影响应税所得,不影响现金流。但各国所得税法不尽相同,如果税务局承认存货跌价,则2008年利润高的情况下交税多,CFO就少,无论怎么判断都不是overstateB错误。真实情况是发生了存货跌价,但是又转回了,存货价值先降低,然后又增加,最后的存货价值与没发生跌价 回转的情况是相同的,所两种情况下,2008年存货的价值是相等的,不存在高估或低估的情况,C错误。 我理解NI是2018年的增量,INV是存量,COGS在2017年末先下降,所以影响了NI,而COGS在2018年上升,对INV没影响,是这个意思么

2023-02-26 22:20 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2016012101000147问题如下Zimt wrote wn the value of its inventory in 2007 anreversethe write-wn in 2008. Compareto the results the company woulhave reporteif the write-wn hnever occurre Zimt’s reporte2008:(assume the companies use a perioc inventory system)A.profit woverstateB.cash flow from operations woverstateC.year-eninventory balanwoverstate is correct.The reversof the write-wn shiftecost of sales from 2008 to 2007. The 2007 cost of sales whigher because of the write-wn, anthe 2008 cost of sales wlower because of the reversof the write-wn. a result, the reporte2008 profits were overstate Inventory balanin 2008 is the same because the write-wn anreverscancel eaother out. Cash flow from operations is not affectethe non-cash write-wn, but the higher profits in 2008 likely resultein higher taxes anthus lower cash flow from operations.解析题目问相比假设2007年不发生存货跌价(那么2008年就没有回转了),真实情况中(发生了跌价和回转)的2008年财报数字会怎么样?相比没发生什么都没发生的情形,实际的2008年的COGS更低,因此NI更高,所以profit高估了,A正确。跌价和回转是否会影响到应税所得,取决于所得税法是否承认计提存货跌价准备,一般来说税务局不承认存货跌价准备,因此存货跌价和回转不影响应税所得,不影响现金流。但各国所得税法不尽相同,如果税务局承认存货跌价,则2008年利润高的情况下交税多,CFO就少,无论怎么判断都不是overstateB错误。真实情况是发生了存货跌价,但是又转回了,存货价值先降低,然后又增加,最后的存货价值与没发生跌价 回转的情况是相同的,所两种情况下,2008年存货的价值是相等的,不存在高估或低估的情况,C错误。 交税多不应该现金流流出的就多吗?为什么cfo会少,突然不理解了

2023-02-18 23:05 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2016012101000147 问题如下 Zimt wrote wn the value of its inventory in 2007 anreversethe write-wn in 2008. Compareto the results the company woulhave reporteif the write-wn hnever occurre Zimt’s reporte2008:(assume the companies use a perioc inventory system) A.profit woverstate B.cash flow from operations woverstate C.year-eninventory balanwoverstate is correct.The reversof the write-wn shiftecost of sales from 2008 to 2007. The 2007 cost of sales whigher because of the write-wn, anthe 2008 cost of sales wlower because of the reversof the write-wn. a result, the reporte2008 profits were overstate Inventory balanin 2008 is the same because the write-wn anreverscancel eaother out. Cash flow from operations is not affectethe non-cash write-wn, but the higher profits in 2008 likely resultein higher taxes anthus lower cash flow from operations.解析题目问相比假设2007年不发生存货跌价(那么2008年就没有回转了),真实情况中(发生了跌价和回转)的2008年财报数字会怎么样?相比没发生什么都没发生的情形,实际的2008年的COGS更低,因此NI更高,所以profit高估了,A正确。跌价和回转是否会影响到应税所得,取决于所得税法是否承认计提存货跌价准备,一般来说税务局不承认存货跌价准备,因此存货跌价和回转不影响应税所得,不影响现金流。但各国所得税法不尽相同,如果税务局承认存货跌价,则2008年利润高的情况下交税多,CFO就少,无论怎么判断都不是overstateB错误。真实情况是发生了存货跌价,但是又转回了,存货价值先降低,然后又增加,最后的存货价值与没发生跌价 回转的情况是相同的,所两种情况下,2008年存货的价值是相等的,不存在高估或低估的情况,C错误。 先减值在回转与什么都没发生相比,COGS应该没有改变,为什么说COGS会减少,profit会增加?

2023-02-04 22:06 3 · 回答

NO.PZ2016012101000147问题如下Zimt wrote wn the value of its inventory in 2007 anreversethe write-wn in 2008. Compareto the results the company woulhave reporteif the write-wn hnever occurre Zimt’s reporte2008:(assume the companies use a perioc inventory system)A.profit woverstateB.cash flow from operations woverstateC.year-eninventory balanwoverstate is correct.The reversof the write-wn shiftecost of sales from 2008 to 2007. The 2007 cost of sales whigher because of the write-wn, anthe 2008 cost of sales wlower because of the reversof the write-wn. a result, the reporte2008 profits were overstate Inventory balanin 2008 is the same because the write-wn anreverscancel eaother out. Cash flow from operations is not affectethe non-cash write-wn, but the higher profits in 2008 likely resultein higher taxes anthus lower cash flow from operations.解析题目问相比假设2007年不发生存货跌价(那么2008年就没有回转了),真实情况中(发生了跌价和回转)的2008年财报数字会怎么样?相比没发生什么都没发生的情形,实际的2008年的COGS更低,因此NI更高,所以profit高估了,A正确。跌价和回转是否会影响到应税所得,取决于所得税法是否承认计提存货跌价准备,一般来说税务局不承认存货跌价准备,因此存货跌价和回转不影响应税所得,不影响现金流。但各国所得税法不尽相同,如果税务局承认存货跌价,则2008年利润高的情况下交税多,CFO就少,无论怎么判断都不是overstateB错误。真实情况是发生了存货跌价,但是又转回了,存货价值先降低,然后又增加,最后的存货价值与没发生跌价 回转的情况是相同的,所两种情况下,2008年存货的价值是相等的,不存在高估或低估的情况,C错误。 姨爹谁在先在后很关键啊?老是分不清楚。

2023-01-25 09:02 1 · 回答


【本文地址】

公司简介

联系我们

今日新闻

    推荐新闻

    专题文章
      CopyRight 2018-2019 实验室设备网 版权所有